PLAYBOY HAS LOST ITS BALLSĀ
It just has to be said. Cancel your subscriptions to Playboy magazine. Now!
The latest safe-for-work issue is on newsstands and it is the first in history without female nudity. As a former executive for the company, I can only describe my reaction as nauseated. But more disturbing to me, as a long-time true believer in what Hugh Hefner created as the ultimate sophisticated magazine for men, I admit, Iām also saddened.
Not only is the nudity gone, but the beard-wearing millennial nerds who run the magazine have eliminated the classic cover tagline āEntertainment For Men,ā clearly signaling total acquiescence to politically correct feminization and frankly a lack of balls (āMy girlfriend thinks itās sexistā ā ugh!). The jokes page is gone, too. Oh, men today are too ācoolā to laugh at the old one-liners and salty limericks. So Rodney Dangerfield and a host of Friars Club legends arenāt funny anymore? The humor may have some grey on it, but itās classic and timeless! Itās downright arrogant to think men of today canāt relate. So whatās funny now, pathetic self-deprecating loser humor the likes of Louie that makes boys feel better about themselves? That might explain it.
Playboyās management told CNN it had a couple of hundred magazine cancellations since the non-nudity announcement. Come on, itās more like a couple of thousand or more in what is a continually declining reader base thatās a result of millenials not reading anymore, NOT because they donāt relate! And whatās astounding is that this ābrain trustā is positioning the new Playboy in the Vanity Fair categoryāa magazine that firmly targets WOMEN!!
Face it; Playboyās excellent reportage and literature had widespread exposure thanks to the eye candy with which it was packaged. Millions of men would never have known the works of major authors if it werenāt for the T&A that brought them into the publication.
Another disturbing announcement came recently when Playboy said itās selling the Holmby Hills Mansion. As someone who met Hefner, walked the halls of Playboyās offices and knew intimately the pedigree and philosophy of the company, it makes me think the new management team somehow got a few decisions past the 89 year-old Hefner.
I can go on and on about Playboyās justifications for the changes: thereās too much nudity on the Internet to compete, the magazine needs to be less explicit to gain advertisers (frankly insane in a society that now embraces nudity on cable TV like never before), and finally that young men simply donāt relate to it anymore.
Well, there is a real reason contemporary āmenā donāt relate to the magazine anymore. Itās because many have been whipped into embracing ultra-feminist political correctness in order to be āliked and acceptedā by women their age. Theyāre now afraid that if they embrace Playboyās former DNA promoting love, romance and, yes, SEX as the greatest pleasure a man could find, then that thinking somehow objectifies women and theyāll then be shunned, missing out on what they really wantāto see their girls nude and to get laid! There was a reason Hefner adopted the āfuck like a bunnyā rabbit as its symbol. And Iām afraid the rabbit has died.
āMagister Dr. Bob Johnson, Editor & Publisher Old Nick Magazine
